More PATH fallout. Who decided this was a good idea?
jkeating at redhat.com
Sun Dec 7 23:05:21 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 10:03 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Perhaps I'm a bit slow this morning, but vipw is forbidden but
> vi /etc/passwd isn't?
I think he means "forbidden by policy" in which using anything /but/ the
audit-able tools is "forbidden by policy". If you're expecting
everybody to follow policy, why not just set policy that says "don't
hack this box". That'll work right?
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the fedora-devel-list