Seahorse is orphaned?
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Dec 8 13:44:49 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 16:45 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> I just noticed that the 'seahorse' package is orphaned [1] although
>> Matthias and others seem to be taking care of it for some time. So is
>> the package really orphaned or is this just an oversight?
>>
>
> Hmm, funny. I've asked Tomas Bzatek to take it. He's the maintainer of
> gnome-keyring-manager, and we are going to obsolete g-k-m in favour of
> seahorse anyway...
>
>
> Matthias
>
Would it be possible to get a name-change on seahorse? It's a great
utility, but the name "seahorse" doesn't do anything at all to indicate
what the program does.
If a user is looking for a way to manage their keyring, how would they
ever know to install a package called "seahorse"?
Is there a really compelling reason why it couldn't just be renamed to
something like gnome-keyring2?
- --
- --------------------
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkk9JNEACgkQeiVVYja6o6NtbACaAkyy+UYofZ95chs+7+rYP93B
ipEAoJgajKvIxXbVJPEnUQ0wNRg55zif
=k2NZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list