Server SIG - work areas

Mat Booth fedora at matbooth.co.uk
Tue Dec 9 13:02:16 UTC 2008


On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Mat Booth <fedora at matbooth.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:41:27AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
>>>
>>> But there is one way, how to achieve similar goal - make EPEL more
>>> complete. Because you probably know how is RHEL created - it is a subset
>>> of one Fedora release. Then add the remaining packages via EPEL and you
>>> have Fedora with long term support.
>>
>> It is not the same. Fedora with LTS would be going from bleeding edge to
>> stability, RHEL+EPEL is always stability.
>>
>
> I don't think I understand this statement. Actually creating each RHEL
> release from a release of Fedora isn't going from bleeding edge to
> stability?
>

Sorry for replying to myself, but another thought occurred after I hit
send: Maybe I don't understand *why* you need bleeding edge if what
you want is stability...


-- 
Mat Booth
www.matbooth.co.uk




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list