[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:06:17AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> These are a pretty reasonable start to a set of guidelines to help users
> determine when and what to push as updates.

I think that it is already pretty good in:
though I don't know what is the approval status of this document.
In general I think that
is well balanced and gives a taste of what are the best practices
without being too binding. 

Problem is that those practices are at odd with what many maintainers do, 
they don't care about regressions or even don't fix bugs, nor ask for 
help and don't consider patches. They don't help fixing other packages 
before they hit stable.

> I think one of the big problems we have is new maintainer training, and
> lack of guidelines like the above.  We just expect them to "figure it
> out" and we shouldn't be surprised when something goes wrong.

I don't think the most problematic updates are those from new
maintainers, the problematic ones are those corresponding with packages
that are used by other packages (non leave packages), or leave packages 
with significant user base, and those are not maintained by new

That being said I think that inded the policies part of the wiki 
should be up to date, and as easy to read as possible, and should
and indeed new maintainers should read those, but new maintainers rarely
break fedora.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]