What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Fri Dec 12 03:56:02 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:39 -0600, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> On 12/11/08, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> > Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> No one is asking for that. The problems with fedora are that there is
> >> no reason to expect any better stability at the end of a fedora version
> >> than at the beginning
> >
> > Uh, Fedora releases _do_ tend to get more stable as updates come in. Taking
> > aside the D-Bus fiasco, F9 is a lot better now than when it was released.
>
> Which implies F10 should have been good at it's release, as it
> benefited from the F9 updates. Right.
Correct, as far as packages are concerned, which happen to be identical
or at least very similar in FC9 and FC10, their is such a effect.
Unfortunately, this effect is outweighed by packages, F10 inherited from
rawhide.
Ralf
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list