Making updates-testing more useful

[Seth Vidal]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> Seth Vidal wrote:
>> I bet it is not wrong. the i386 packages probably provide what was
>> required. They just provide it sub-optimally.
>
> But that's really the problem: yum (*) thinks
>

as opposed to doing what? Everyone wants yum to magically solve problems 
or if it cannot it needs to be able to distinguish b/t the 'next best' 
solution and a 'bad solution'. Which is entirely variable.

What would you have it do?

-sv