[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: orphaning many packages

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I'm taking gnash and its dependencies agg and docbook2X. It's still the only
> Free (if not the only) Flash plugin which works in Konqueror and I was the
> one who got the KDE 4 port built, so I was already a de-facto comaintainer
> if not maintainer.

Do you want the F9 and F10 branches of all those packages?

> As for flasm, it's not really a dependency of gnash, is it? I think somebody
> actually interested in Flash authoring should take that one.

It is not strictly a dependency, but it may be needed to be able to 
debug gnash. What is interesting, indeed, is the possibility to 
disassemble a swf to understand what is in it. I brought it in fedora
because I needed it for a bug report, and I saw it used more than once
for gnash debugging on the gnash mailing list.

Si it is not strictly needed, but convenient. It guess that it is also 
of some interest for swfdec.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]