Proposed PackageRenaming guideline

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:58 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> from memory yes.  you need a re-review  then to EOL the old package. 
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife and 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages 
> hint at it.  We should make it crystal clear  :)

There was recent discussion (on IRC) that some felt a full re-review as
"overkill" or worse "a waste of time".  I think it's fair to re-evaluate
what we're trying to accomplish with a re-review and re-assess if a full
review is indeed what "we" (IE the Fedora community, represented by
FESCo) want.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081218/5903aa23/attachment.sig>