Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Les Mikesell]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
> That wasn't my question. My question is why not just use RHEL or CentOS 
> if you just going to duplicate the same stream of updates for Fedora as 
> well? It just seems busy work for no benefit.

That's precisely what I want to end up doing, but without the disruptive 
  need to re-install and figure out what all those differences you are 
describing as problems are.  And I'd rather not wait until the Centos 
release to start planning local development.  I suspect many others have 
a similar development cycle and need about as much time as fedora itself 
to arrive at something suitable for another long-term starting point.

So, the question is whether someone who understands all the internals 
can plan a clean transition path and do it once, or whether every end 
user that needs stability has to muddle through it separately.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell at gmail.com