Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Les Mikesell]

Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 
> Now I don't think that idea is implementable in practice, at least not
> without major changes to how both RHEL and Fedora are developed which I
> don't think are ever going to happen. But it's the idea and I think Les
> described it pretty clearly. I just disagree with it.

What is your optimal plan for someone to have local applications 
prepared and ready to take advantages of all the new developments in 
RHEL6 the day it is released?

The strategy I'm talking about is pretty much the way things worked 
before the RHEL/fedora split where RH X.0 and X.1 were equivalent to 
fedora versions with X.2 aging to stability, bringing with it the 
involvement of the community that worked through the development 
problems and tested their applications against the changes as they were 
made.

-- 
    Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell at gmail.com