Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea
Horst H. von Brand
vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl
Fri Dec 26 01:59:01 UTC 2008
Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote:
[...]
> I fail to see why no update at all is a better policy than "we update
> what we can when we can, but we no longer officially support this vesion
> of the distribution. Please understand that you are in uncharted
> territory, we'll try to help as much as we can but you might be better by
> simply upgrading to a newer distro."
Because upgrading gives you some assurance that the stuff you depend on
_will_ be maintained. "Perhaps glaring problems will be fixed. Probably
not. If your box gets broken into, tough luck" is _not_ what I would like
people to take home as "Linux experience". Because "But I got it from
Fedora's site! They even shipped an update last month!!" /makes/ Fedora (at
least morally) liable if it goes bad.
Besides, keeping old stuff around for ages /is/ a resource commitment. For
no good reason, even.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list