rpms/texlive-texmf/devel texlive-texmf.spec,1.11,1.12

[Patrice Dumas]

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:45:12PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:42:59 +0100
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Dependency loops are not an issue, the Requires(.) should lead to the
> > correct ordering.
> 
> Except loops do happen, and rpm has to make a decision at some point
> where to break that loop.  Where the loop was being broken was not
> great, as it lead to the problem in the bug report.

I may be wrong, but I think that the loop is badly broken because the
Requires(.) are missing or not right.

--
Pat