to autodownload or not to autodownload
Christopher Aillon
caillon at redhat.com
Sun Feb 10 20:09:15 UTC 2008
On 02/10/2008 02:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> If users want to get non-free items, I would MUCH rather usher them to
>> the legal way to do so versus the illegal way. Fluendo is currently
>> the only legal way we can offer for the US and some other countries.
>>
>
> The same argument could be used for autodownloader, if someone wants to
> play quake, I much rather have they use autodl to download a legal
> version then use some pirated full version.
>
> I really must say I don't understand how people can have an issue with
> autodownloader and at the same time defend codina. To me that is nothing
> shirt of hypocritical.
Here's the bottom line:
Is $MEDIAPLAYER usable if the user decides they don't want to download
any codecs with codeina? Yes, because we ship and support vorbis,
theora, flac, wav, etc.
Is $GAME playable if the user decides they don't want to download the
non-free items? If yes, I'm totally fine with the game using
autodownloader. If no, I have a major problem with the game being in
Fedora. In neither case do I have a problem with autodownloader existing.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list