Licensing issue

Andrew Farris lordmorgul at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 20:48:43 UTC 2008


Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces, which
> are already in Fedora.  When I first got the package into Fedora, I
> stripped those out of the upstream tarball.  A release later, upstream
> removed them.  Then, a release after that, they put them back and I failed
> to notice.  I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will do
> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds.  Do we need to pull the
> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the
> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient?
> 
> Jon

You had the PEAR bits included in roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 itself, but have 
removed them in roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1?  (I just wasn't sure thats what you 
meant, I don't know the answer) :)

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list