Licensing issue

Jon Ciesla limb at jcomserv.net
Sat Feb 2 02:24:42 UTC 2008


> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces,
>> which
>> are already in Fedora.  When I first got the package into Fedora, I
>> stripped those out of the upstream tarball.  A release later, upstream
>> removed them.  Then, a release after that, they put them back and I
>> failed
>> to notice.  I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will
>> do
>> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds.  Do we need to pull the
>> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the
>> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient?
>>
>> Jon
>
> You had the PEAR bits included in roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 itself, but
> have
> removed them in roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1?  (I just wasn't sure thats
> what you
> meant, I don't know the answer) :)

Correct.

> --
> Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
>   gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B
> 1DF3
> No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel
> Geer
> ----
> ----
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list