Licensing issue
Jon Ciesla
limb at jcomserv.net
Sat Feb 2 02:24:42 UTC 2008
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> Roundcubemail, at one time, conatined some PHP-licensed PEAR pieces,
>> which
>> are already in Fedora. When I first got the package into Fedora, I
>> stripped those out of the upstream tarball. A release later, upstream
>> removed them. Then, a release after that, they put them back and I
>> failed
>> to notice. I've corrected this in the current Fedora builds, and will
>> do
>> Bodhi releases, as well as EPEL builds. Do we need to pull the
>> roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 builds and SRPMS, or is the presence of the
>> roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1 builds sufficient?
>>
>> Jon
>
> You had the PEAR bits included in roundcubemail-0.1-0.8rc2.1 itself, but
> have
> removed them in roundcubemail-0.1-0.9rc2.1? (I just wasn't sure thats
> what you
> meant, I don't know the answer) :)
Correct.
> --
> Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
> gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B
> 1DF3
> No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel
> Geer
> ----
> ----
>
--
novus ordo absurdum
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list