feature process should require release notes/docs

[Yaakov Nemoy]

2008/2/5 Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com>:
> In preparation to asking FESCo to amend the feature process, I'd like to
> find out if there is going to be an uprising from y'all against the
> idea.
>
> Currently, the feature process does not specifically require release
> notes or documentation, nor provide for FESCo to block a feature because
> of missing or poor feature documentation.  We think the feature
> policy[1] should be amended[2] to require this.
>
> It is clear in the spirit and the letter of the current policy that some
> amount of content from the feature owners is required.  The policy makes
> these related points:
>
>         * It's a feature, we're trying to make noise about it, and the
>         rest of the world needs meaningful content about the feature

It's my feature, I'm willing to shout out about it.  In fact I want
everyone to know what I did.  If they didn't who would bother to use
what I put together? +1


-Yaakov