Glade(2/3) and Anjuta in comps-f9.xml

Matthias Clasen mclasen at
Wed Feb 6 14:03:45 UTC 2008

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:30 +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
> Looking at
> I find that Glade2 and Anjuta are marked as default and optional
> respectively. While Glade 3.4.1 (separate package from Glade2) is
> already there in the repositories, we are soon going to have a fresh
> new Anjuta package (atleast 2.2.3) in Fedora.
> However, the latest versions of Anjuta -- both 2.2.3 (stable) and
> 2.3.x (unstable) -- need Glade3 for its Glade plugin to work. So can
> we consider replacing Glade2 by Glade3 in the for
> Fedora 9? As far as I know, this would affect the Live Developer Spin
> and the non-live GNOME DVD.
> What do you think?

I'd say that depends entirely on whether glade3 can handle all glade
files produced by glade2. Can it ?

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list