to autodownload or not to autodownload
Chris Adams
cmadams at hiwaay.net
Sat Feb 9 16:19:27 UTC 2008
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> said:
> Flash is not an essential part of a person's life, you can do very well without
> _any_ Flash player, Free or proprietary.
Well, Fedora "is not an essential part of a person's life" either.
However, I need a fully-functional Flash player as part of my job,
because some vendor websites use it. If you are saying I shouldn't use
Flash on Fedora, you are telling me I shouldn't use Fedora on my
desktop.
The free Flash players, as distributed in Fedora, will _always_ be
broken, as they can't include MP3 for audio (at least until about 2017).
If it allowable for codecbuddy to point to a gratis MP3 codec, why is it
not allowable for something to point to a gratis Flash player,
especially when it is the "standard" and the company behind it actually
sets up a repo for use with Fedora (as opposed to the MP3 situation)?
--
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list