to autodownload or not to autodownload
Matej Cepl
mcepl at redhat.com
Mon Feb 11 09:09:24 UTC 2008
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:00:08 +0100, Valent Turkovic scripst:
> I tested swfdec in detail and I find it useless for general online usage
> today. Offcourse that it will get impoved and I welcome the day I can
> use it instead of proprietary ones, but that day is not today
> unfortunatelly. And in order to use swfdec you still need unlegalized
> fedora packages from livna if you didn't know.
Valent,
I believe you mean it well, but there are many people on this thread who
are in free software (or open software, whatever) world much longer than
you seemed to be. We all heard the message "this free software is so far
piece of shit, let's include this proprietary one, or the sky will fall
on our head (or every Fedora user will move to Ubuntu/openSuSE; that's
the last version of such fear), and meanwhile hopefully somebody else
will develop the free one". And very certainly there are only two
outcomes of this, depending on the decision made in the fork.
a) people will keep a stiff upper lip and fight the problems with the
free software until we have one (I didn't believe half a year ago, that I
can actually have free codec which works reasonably well with YouTube,
even when I was talking with swfdec conference about it), or
b) we use proprietary software and the free one dies horrible death by
neglect and lack of interest. The result is we are no better than before.
Unfortunately, the main point is -- THERE IS NOBODY ELSE THAN US! If we
won't use the free software, nobody will. If you have to use proprietary
software, go and use it, if you need Windows, go and use them (that's no
sneering at you, I really mean it -- if you need to use now the stuff
which is proprietary only, go and use it -- you know how, anyway; no bad
feeling on my side).
But please don't make it easy to use proprietary software inside of
Linux, and especially don't push for putting bad (so far bad, hopefully)
free software on the back burner. It will never get cooked there.
I know and perfectly understand that a lot of free software when it
starts is pretty poor quality comparing to its proprietary competitors --
hey, I was around when Gnome 1.0.* was the last word on really really
free desktop -- ask anybody who was then around how horrible piece of
sh..t Enlightment was then. It was actually so bad, that it made me to
use KDE for the next seven years. Morale of this story is somehow
confused, because /somebody else/ stick with Gnome even when it was bad
as it was and make it working, but the point is that there are many
projects (Amaya, Mozilla, and many many less known others) which never
got enough traction and died horrible death, because people stick with
their proprietary competitors while the free software was really bad
(both Amaya and Mozilla/Seamonkey are still around, but thet never grown
to be as useful as they might be, IMHO).
My thoughts are probably too confused in the moment to write it well, so
I rather stop.
Matěj
--
The content of this message is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 License, Some Rights Reserved.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list