Git has too many freaking dependencies

[Ville Skyttä]

On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:

> Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
> git-meta so there is no ambiguity.

I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta".  If the intent is to 
install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or just drop 
the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.