Git has too many freaking dependencies

[Denis Leroy]

Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> 
>> Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
>> git-meta so there is no ambiguity.
> 
> I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta".  If the intent is to 
> install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or just drop 
> the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.

+1