rawhide report: 20080211 changes
Michael Schwendt
mschwendt at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 11:08:51 UTC 2008
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:21:55 +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Ok, so if I understand correctly what has been said in the thread, what
> we want is not compat-xerces-c but xerces-c27. I have forked a new spec
> from the original xerces-c spec. It should be almost good to go (I still
> need to clean up the descriptions and summaries. I may also remove the
> -doc subpackage).
>
> http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/xerces-c27.spec
>
> The last remaining problem is the /usr/lib/libxerces-c.so and
> /usr/lib/libxerces-depdom.so symlinks. They will conflict with the
> regular xerces-c-devel package. They are currently excluded. Is that the
> right thing to do ?
No, because then you cannot compile/link against those libraries.
If Fedora policies do permit explicit "Conflicts:" with xerces-c-devel,
do that. Else relocate any conflicting files to a new directory, so you
can link with -L/usr/lib/xerces-c-2.7 -lxerces-c for example.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list