system-* tools' ui independence

[Callum Lerwick]

On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 15:19 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-02-29, 09:23 GMT, Trond Danielsen wrote:
> > The SHMConfig option is only needed to access additional 
> > configuration options, but basic functionality is available 
> > without any modifications to xorg.conf.
> 
> Just to note that SHMConfig is explicitly WONTFIX — developers 
> don’t like it because of its terrible security implications.

Well, we need the functionality *somehow*. If SHMConfig is insecure,
then we really need to find another way to do it...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080229/413ea6fb/attachment.sig>