tetex-fonts replacement?

Jindrich Novy jnovy at redhat.com
Fri Jan 4 12:50:48 UTC 2008


On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I received this message today:
> > 
> > dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> > On ppc:
> >         dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On x86_64:
> >         dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On i386:
> >         dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On ppc64:
> >         dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> > 
> 
> This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
> package contains:
> 
> Obsoletes:      texlive-fonts < 2007-6
> Provides:       texlive-fonts = 2007-6
> 
> What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
> the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
> to have a look at it.
> 

Ok, in case of *tetex-fonts*, to add the virtual provide for it is a
trivial fix. I'll build it today.  The texlive-fonts virtual provides
work good as expected of course.

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy at redhat.com>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list