tetex-fonts replacement?
Jindrich Novy
jnovy at redhat.com
Fri Jan 4 12:50:48 UTC 2008
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I received this message today:
> >
> > dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> > On ppc:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On x86_64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On i386:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On ppc64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
>
> This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
> package contains:
>
> Obsoletes: texlive-fonts < 2007-6
> Provides: texlive-fonts = 2007-6
>
> What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
> the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
> to have a look at it.
>
Ok, in case of *tetex-fonts*, to add the virtual provide for it is a
trivial fix. I'll build it today. The texlive-fonts virtual provides
work good as expected of course.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy at redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list