Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]

Will Woods wwoods at redhat.com
Wed Jan 9 22:26:05 UTC 2008


On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:17 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:51 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
> 
> > FWIW I liked the idea of Core vs. Extras because if it was in Core it
> > was expected to work, if it was in Extras it was buyer beware.
> 
> The Core/Extras split still exists in the sense of "some packages are
> more important than others"- it's just now defined as the set of
> packages included in the Live image kickstart files and comps.

Live and/or the Default Install set. We should probably have a better
way of listing of what that set of packages actually is so we can make
sure they get extra attention during updates and whatnot.

-w
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080109/c12d8327/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list