Pulse Audio 0.9.8 - upgrade?

King InuYasha ngompa13 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 22:57:37 UTC 2008


Well, there is also the issue that JACK module was not re added to
PulseAudio until 0.9.8. It was taken out of the 0.9.7 release, and people
who NEED that functionality should have the JACK module support in
PulseAudio.

On Jan 10, 2008 8:05 AM, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff at ocjtech.us> wrote:

> On 1/10/08, Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Christopher Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > http://pulseaudio.org/milestone/0.9.8
> > >
> > > gives some good reasons to upgrade. This is more than just "a change
> > > of one digit in a version number". In any event my comment related not
> > > just to pulseaudio but to Fedora as a whole. Point releases reflect
> > > bug fixes - usually - and so upgrading to resolve outstanding bugs is
> > > something that I and many users no doubt will applaud. You are not
> > > forced to accept these upgrades.
> >
> > We are yet to hear from Lennart about this, but I was under the
> > impression that the pulseaudio shipped in F8 was a svn snapshot *very*
> > close to 0.9.8.
> >
> > pulseaudio-0.9.7-0.17.svn20071017.fc8 was built October 30th
> > 0.9.8 was released November 20th
>
> I don't see how the code in 0.9.7-0.17.svn20071017.fc8 could possibly
> be considered very close to 0.9.8, seeing as any SVN snapshot from
> 2007-10-17 is almost two weeks before 0.9.7 was tagged/released on
> 2007-10-30.
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080110/600f5172/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list