Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 21:44:31 UTC 2008
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 2:30 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It doesn't seem as sensible as being able to plug into a known
>> controller position and get a known device name, particularly in the
>> scenario where the drives aren't hot-plug and you want to access a bunch
>> of new ones after a reboot and know which is which.
>
>
> Frankly i like this idea, but I'm unsure of the practicality of it:
>
> What is the highest level which is even aware of the physical location
> of said device? I would imagine the BIOS knows, and maybe some really
> low level kernel modules but anything above that?
The bios doesn't necessarily know anything except for the one(s) that it
might boot. But I think there may be some extra magic in what the
kernel does with the names depending on which drive bios used to boot.
The stuff in /dev/disk/by-path might be useful for the versions that
have it, but I can't see anything for the empty controller positions
where the drives aren't connected so the arrangement doesn't make a lot
of sense.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list