compilation architecture

[Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek]

2008/1/12, Chris Snook <csnook at redhat.com>:
>
> Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
> > So I can say only one thing: "fedora does something in wrong,
> > performance-loss way".
>
> I'm not sure if this is still the case, but I know SuSE used to not enable
> synchronization in syslogd.  Yes, synchronization slows down your logging,
> but
> it also greatly improves the chances of having a record of why a system
> crashed,
> which is important.
>
> I don't mean this as a knock on SuSE, and I don't think that's why you're
> seeing
> this difference on your desktop, but it's a great example of how people
> with
> different design priorities can make different, reasonable decisions that
> may
> seem wrong to someone with the other priorities.
>
> Performance is all about tradeoffs.  If you actually analyze the problem,
> you
> can usually design an intermediate solution that's good enough for people
> across
> most of the spectrum.  There will always be outliers with special needs,
> but you
> can usually make Fedora (or openSuSE for that matter) satisfy them will a
> little
> careful tweaking.
>
>         -- Chris
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

Fedora and openSUSE (there are openSUSE and SuSE - actuall spelling) are
both using rsyslog, the newer, modern system logger.

-- 
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080112/ff3d66b3/attachment.htm>