Requesting feedback for unaccepted Fedora features

[Casey Dahlin]

Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:49:21PM -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
>   
>> In addition, the following features are targeted for Fedora 9 in their 
>> writeup, but are not in CategoryProposedFedora9.  If you have no intention 
>> of completing them for Fedora 9,
>> please remove Fedora 9 as the targeted release so that there is no 
>> confusion that it will not be in Fedora 9.  These features will never be 
>> raised for acceptance by FESCo.
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureXULRunner
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewGdm
>>     
>
> So what happens if these never get officially "accepted" as Fedora 9 
> features?  Do we rip out XULRunner and back down to the old GDM?  Who 
> is going to enforce that?
>
>   
This is a good point. A couple of these features have kind of happened 
anyway, and are now easier to run with than they are to revert. What do 
we do about this?

--CJD