[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Mass rebuild status with gcc-4.3.0-0.4 of rawhide-20071220
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer gmail com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Mass rebuild status with gcc-4.3.0-0.4 of rawhide-20071220
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:22:11 -0600
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:30:14 -0500
Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:11:33AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:02:42 -0500
> > Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > fails-even-with-41/powerpc-utils-1.0.6-2.fc9.log
> error: Architecture is not included: x86_64
> > > fails-even-with-41/powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-2.fc9.log
> DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for librtas-devel
> (but has ExclusiveArch: ppc ppc64 anyway, so even if librtas-devel was
> included, it would fail to build anyway).
> > > fails-even-with-41/ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.log
> error: Architecture is not included: x86_64
> > > fails-even-with-41/ps3pf-utils-2.1-1.fc9.log
> error: Architecture is not included: x86_64
>
> > These seem like bogus results. Looking at the logs, you might have hit
> > some mock/builder problems that were being seen a while ago.
>
> I said that fails-even-with-41 includes even ExcludeArched packages
> and that the build was on x86_64. As for me fails-even-with-41
> category is DONTCARE, I haven't spent time to categorize them further.
Ok, fair enough. I just did scratch builds on the gcc43 tag for all
three and they built fine. You can take them off your list.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]