[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: tetex-fonts replacement?
- From: Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: tetex-fonts replacement?
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:50:48 +0100
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:11:55AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I received this message today:
> >
> > dblatex has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> > On ppc:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On x86_64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On i386:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > On ppc64:
> > dblatex - 0.2.8-2.fc9.1.noarch requires tetex-fonts
> > Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
>
> This is caused by texlive and texlive-fonts package merge. The texlive
> package contains:
>
> Obsoletes: texlive-fonts < 2007-6
> Provides: texlive-fonts = 2007-6
>
> What should have fixed the missing texlive-fonts by providing it by
> the main texlive package. It doesn't work for some reason so will need
> to have a look at it.
>
Ok, in case of *tetex-fonts*, to add the virtual provide for it is a
trivial fix. I'll build it today. The texlive-fonts virtual provides
work good as expected of course.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]