Is anyone packaging sage?

[Andreas Bierfert]

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:

> I'd do things in the following order:
> 1. package required build-time dependencies
> 2. package required run-time dependencies
> 3. package as many optional build-time dependencies as possible
> 4. package SAGE itself
> 5. package optional run-time dependencies (and decide on a case by case basis 
> whether it makes sense to add them as actual Requires: dependencies to the 
> package or not)

Sounds good to me. Would be cool to make a wiki page with these things and let
people assign themselves to the packages that are not handled yet...

> I think we could really use a Mathematics SIG. Count me as interested (I'm a 
> PhD student in Mathematics). I think Rex Dieter is likely to be interested
> too as he's working as a sysadmin for the Department of Mathematics at UNL.
> (Of course we're both already very busy with KDE SIG matters though. ;-) )
> And as the interest in this thread is showing, there's probably more
> potentially interested folks. :-)

+1

- Andreas

-- 
Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc.        | http://awbsworld.de      | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de     | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373         | cell: +49 173 5803043    | mail preferred
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080105/f53de14b/attachment.sig>