[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mktexlsr/texhash/texconfig-sys rehash, what's the canonical %post/%postun for a TeX thing ?
- From: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: mktexlsr/texhash/texconfig-sys rehash, what's the canonical %post/%postun for a TeX thing ?
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:29:48 +0100
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:24:51PM +0000, Caolan McNamara wrote:
>
> Yes, running rehashing of the kpathsea's ls-R files via texconfig-sys
> as noted above shouldn't break anything and should correctly call
> mktexlsr to regenerate ls-Rs. I actually suggested it to Ondrej while
> fixing the jadetex and iproute build.
Calling
/usr/bin/env - /usr/bin/texhash
should also do the right thing. Currently there is a bug in texhash
when $HOME is empty, introduced in texlive-mktexlsr_fixes.patch.
I'll see what I can do.
--
Pat
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]