Init : someone could comment this ?
jonathan.underwood at gmail.com
Sun Jan 6 17:25:55 UTC 2008
On 06/01/2008, Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin at ncsu.edu> wrote:
> Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > On 06/01/2008, Casey Dahlin <cjdahlin at ncsu.edu> wrote:
> >> There is work being done in this area for Fedora as well. I've been
> >> working on a parallel booting system for us that also will provide dbus
> >> notifications for the starting of various services. (Hopefully I'll be
> >> leading a hackfest at FUDCon in a few days to get a few more eyes and
> >> hands on the code).
> > Other than compatability with sysvinit scripts, why was upstart dismissed?
> Many options were looked at during the last iteration of this
> discussion, and by my understanding prcsys was the one that won out. See
That's a shame, because the roadmap for upstart includes better
sysvinit compatibility, dbus support for IPC, service mangement et.
It seems to me that many of the reasons for dismissing upstart in
favour of a write-from-scratch have since disappeared.
More information about the fedora-devel-list