Re: Bruttaly sluggish Eclipse performance in remote X

[Dimi Paun <dimi lattica com>]

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 14:58 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Do you get good performance on the local display of both boxes ?

Yes, I do. No problems here.

> Do you get good neatwork throughput between boxes?

Yes, I do:

[dimi dimi download]$ scp mihai shrek:~mihai/download/ipligence/worldlocations.csv.gz tmp
worldlocations.csv.gz        100%   33MB  33.3MB/s   00:01    


> What is the ping time betewwn boxes?

[dimi dimi download]$ ping shrek
PING shrek.lattica.com (192.168.3.12) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.175 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.154 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms

--- shrek.lattica.com ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 4999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.148/0.159/0.175/0.008 ms


-- 
Dimi Paun <dimi lattica com>
Lattica, Inc.