[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Init : someone could comment this ?

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 19:48 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Till Maas <opensource till name> writes:
> >> | kill(pid, SIGTERM); /* wait for timeout/sigchld */ kill(pid, SIGKILL);
> >
> > Imho there is some code missing, that the pid really belongs to the
> > service,
> no; as already written, modern initsystems use non-forking daemons where
> such checks are not needed anymore.
> > e.g. when the service died/crashed and the pid file still exists
> pidfiles are ancient hacks not required by modern initsystems anymore.

 That's just not true, for example:


...maybe you mean that they support it, and _in your opinion_
application code should change to use that model ... but that's a very
different thing.

James Antill <james antill redhat com>
Red Hat

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]