Fedora too cutting edge?

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Thu Jan 10 18:25:33 UTC 2008

Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>>>> Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> writes:
>>>>> As for this being fixed, not for my case, as I have a via vt 6306
>>>>> controller, which is like, only the most common PC firewire controller
>>>>> on the planet.
>>>> It should do OHCI 1.1, you may want to take the risk and try the
>>>> program. Make sure you have a backup (the GUID and possibly whole
>>>> EEPROM data).
>>>> VIA claims both VT6306 and VT6307 are OHCI-1.1 (capable), I just
>>>> have no VT6306 to test (actually it seems VT6307 is a cheeper
>>>> version, aimed at motherboard manufacturers).
>>> Honestly, I'd rather we just figured out what's wrong with the Via
>>> chipsets in
>>> OHCI 1.0 mode, rather than relying on people flashing their
>>> controllers to 1.1
>>> mode. I've got a few ideas, hoping to get back to juju hacking shortly...
>> I didn't flash my controller, I wanted too, but it turned out it already
>> was put in 1.1 by the manufacturer of the card I'm using.
>> I'm willing to flash to 1.0 mode to help test IIDC in 1.0 mode though,
>> but first let get IIDC working with the card in 1.1 mode :)
> I hope to have a rawhide kernel built soonish with some additional bits from
> the linux1394 git tree that may solve your iidc problems (and if I'm lucky, a
> few other items on my todo list).

Sounds good, let me know when koji has something to test for me.



More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list