[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

From: "Joachim Frieben" <joachim frieben googlemail com>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:48:48 +0100

On Jan 15, 2008 7:53 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:

Joachim Frieben (joachim frieben googlemail com) said:
> vim-X11 has a lot more dependencies than vim-enhanced, in particular on
> GNOME.

vim-X11 has no gnome dependencies.

GTK != GNOME, just as QT != KDE.

Bill

A GNOME build is actually possible among many others, but in the present case, you're absolutely right: the current build definitely chooses the GTK frontend, not the GNOME one. The resulting dependencies are thus only slightly increased with respect to vim-enhanced.

References:
- Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Karsten Hopp
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Michał Bentkowski
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Till Maas
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Joachim Frieben
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Bill Nottingham

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]