Re: SELinux removed from desktop cd spin?

[Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com>]

Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Those are just a nonsense quotes as yours. I understand security. I also 
> understand desktop usability.  I believe that SELinux it too raw for 
> general purpose desktop. Give it a year or two to mature and maybe then.

How is this 'maturing' process supposed to occur when the vast majority of 
general purpose users are not even trying it?  The rawhide testers using it on a 
daily basis cannot possibly invoke all the possible combinations of operations 
that lead to selinux issues, and they don't have all the proprietary software to 
install and find out what happens.  When a user tries it and runs into problems, 
they can turn it off.  When a user never tries it, the problems stay hidden (and 
no thats not a better result).

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com> <ajfarris gmail com>
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----