SELinux removed from desktop cd spin?

[Valent Turkovic]

Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 1:19 AM, Valent Turkovic <valent.turkovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>> On Jan 16, 2008 12:35 PM, Valent Turkovic <valent.turkovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> What is your target audience with SELinux?
>>> Everyone who runs a computer that takes input from an external source,
>>> whether that be floppies, or a network connection, or a bluetooth
>>> keyboard.  Security matters... it doesn't matter if you are a desktop
>>> user or not... security matters.  If we are doing a good enough job at
>>> policy writing and management then we fix the policies.
>> Will fedora include virus scanners? If not why?
>>
>>> You really need to go back and read every single blog post from Dan
>>> Walsh concerning the new xguest policy he is working on.  He's got
>>> very clear and very real desktop usage cases in mind for it.  Turning
>>> selinux off wholesale on a desktop spin just because its not optimal
>>> yet, is short-sighted.
>> When it becomes usable for general use, by all means, enable it by
>> default. There is no real threat to linux desktop users from any source
>> and there has been zero viruses or explioits that had any significant
>> impact on any linux desktop. I don't see that changing in next 5 years
>> so why force desktop users now to have this rough edged products bother
>> them all the time?
>>
>> Valent
> 
> 
> You have yet to explain why two clicks after install, or one click at
> first boot is too many.
> 

It is not, nobody said that it was. The problem is people knowing that 
those clicks mean. Does anaconda explain what SELinux does? Please show 
me where if you see it because I don't.