Package request: MICO or OmniORB

Benjamin Kreuter ben.kreuter at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 16:32:16 UTC 2008


Hi everyone --

I noticed that there aren't any C++ ORBs packages with Fedora.  Although there 
is a C++ binding for ORBit2, it is not package, and worse than that, it is 
broken (the code it generates is not valid C++ and does not compile).

MICO and OmniORB are both working and licensed under LGPL.  Perhaps we should 
include one of them?  MICO is stable and well known, and several books have 
been written about it, so it would seem to be a good first choice.  However, 
OmniORB has both C++ and Python bindings, and so it might be more useful for 
Fedora (although ORBit also has Python bindings, so that point may be moot).

-- Benjamin Kreuter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080122/0318c0cc/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list