Virtual provides for window managers

Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek jakub.rusinek at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 18:43:32 UTC 2008


Dnia 22-01-2008, wto o godzinie 13:45 -0500, Matthias Clasen pisze:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 00:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > System-config-display has a hard dependency on metacity while it is not 
> > required at all in say the KDE or Xfce spin. I believe the ideal 
> > solution would be to have add a virtual provides to all the window 
> > managers and then depend on it from system-config-display
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427814
> > 
> > What would be the best way to move ahead with this now? File individual 
> > bug reports against each of them?
> 
> Have you checked why s-c-d has a dependency on metacity ?!
> 
> It is there because it runs metacity if there is no X server/wm around.
> Having twm installed will help little for that...
> 

What about eg. fvwm instead of twm? twm doesn't look familiar for
GNOME/KDE user at all...

-- 
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080122/5eb9d63b/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list