[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: long term support release

Hash: SHA1

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:16:30 -0900
> "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta gmail com> wrote:
>> Legacy was not a failure... it was a key part of the process of
>> defining what the limits are with the resources we have. Now that we
>> have gone through that, the people who have survived the process have
>> a much better idea of what it takes in terms of a resource commitment
>> to pull it off.
>> I have absolutely no problem with another attempt at community effort
>> as a follow-up to what Legacy did. I just don't think its where this
>> community of contributors wants to contribute. I think at a minimum
>> there are 3rd support specialists out there with a business interest
>> in a Fedora LTS, or perhaps niche hardware vendors in the embedded
>> space which could be persuaded to leverage Fedora as a development
>> platform. Lots of unexplored area.
> It's perfectly OK to fail, in fact we should fail more often, and share
> the results of those failures.  It's only by failure that we'll know
> the limits of our abilities.

Dude. That's deep.

- --
Jarod Wilson
jwilson redhat com

Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]