[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Requesting feedback for unaccepted Fedora features

Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:49:21PM -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
In addition, the following features are targeted for Fedora 9 in their writeup, but are not in CategoryProposedFedora9. If you have no intention of completing them for Fedora 9, please remove Fedora 9 as the targeted release so that there is no confusion that it will not be in Fedora 9. These features will never be raised for acceptance by FESCo.


So what happens if these never get officially "accepted" as Fedora 9 features? Do we rip out XULRunner and back down to the old GDM? Who is going to enforce that?

This is a good point. A couple of these features have kind of happened anyway, and are now easier to run with than they are to revert. What do we do about this?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]