[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Requesting feedback for unaccepted Fedora features



Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:49:21PM -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
In addition, the following features are targeted for Fedora 9 in their writeup, but are not in CategoryProposedFedora9. If you have no intention of completing them for Fedora 9, please remove Fedora 9 as the targeted release so that there is no confusion that it will not be in Fedora 9. These features will never be raised for acceptance by FESCo.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureXULRunner
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewGdm

So what happens if these never get officially "accepted" as Fedora 9 features? Do we rip out XULRunner and back down to the old GDM? Who is going to enforce that?

This is a good point. A couple of these features have kind of happened anyway, and are now easier to run with than they are to revert. What do we do about this?

--CJD


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]