long term support release

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jan 24 18:24:57 UTC 2008


On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:

> I think a FL-like project with _no_ QA (i.e. working like FE used to
> (as soon as the package is built, it gets signed and released in the
> next push), but without ACLs or even a honor-based concept of
> maintainership like in the old FE) would be more likely to work. If
> someone wants to fix a security issue in a package, let them do it
> and push the package immediately as soon as it's available.

That's pretty terrible because now you have no trust that the issue was
actually fixed.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080124/38e7271d/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list