[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: F9 Alpha spinning
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand inf utfsm cl>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>, Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: F9 Alpha spinning
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:50:19 -0300
Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at> wrote:
> Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka <at> ntfs-3g.org> writes:
[...]
> > If you're interested then you may read the text starting at "The big
> > change this time is ..." at the below URL for the explanation why you're
> > misunderstanding the situation:
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ntfs-3g.devel/392
> Well, your arguments are pretty unconvincing, and apply to a lot of
> application-library relationships, still usually library users won't fork a
> library just for that, or when they do, Fedora won't ship their fork.
AFAIU this is an /upstream/ decision, not a Fedora one.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]