On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 19:21 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de> wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 22:29 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 12:12 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
As a developer, it's not a major problem for _me_ having to cope with a
couple of issues here and there, but how do you expect "Aunt Tillie" to
cope with them?
Perhaps Fedora isn't for her then.
We are back to the point of questioning Fedora's target audience. As it
currently seem to me the target audience is "RH distro developers".
If so, how is that wrong?
Interests collide. "RH distro developers" interests are different from
"end users" (even when putting "Aunt Tillie" aside) and "upstreams" and
development.
E.g. SELinux, NetworkManager, Pulseaudio are widely non-interesting to
me. If they worked transparently and smoothlessly, I would simply use
them and not waste a single word about them, like I do with many other
packages on a distro. Fact is, they don't work smoothless.