[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F9 Alpha spinning

On 01/30/2008 04:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 01/26/2008 05:05 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
Here are some stats of todays re-spin against the latest f9-alpha bits and
livecd configs.  It looks like our desktop spin lost 2mb overnight,
while everything else got bigger. In the diff below, I also include a list
of packages that have shrunk since F8.

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6G 2008-01-26 02:28 F9-Alpha-Developer-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 767M 2008-01-26 02:42 F9-Alpha-FEL-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0G 2008-01-26 15:25 F9-Alpha-games-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 712M 2008-01-26 01:18 F9-Alpha-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 688M 2008-01-26 01:46 F9-Alpha-KDE-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 801M 2008-01-26 02:02 F9-Alpha-KDE-x86_64-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 768M 2008-01-26 01:35 F9-Alpha-x86_64-20080126.0.iso

Whatever happened to the Desktop spin?

The desktop spin has never been called that in the filename. What you need is


I'm not talking about the default "Fedora" spin which provides a desktop (and which also lets you install server stuff). The "Desktop" spin was the targeted desktop spin of packages, and with tweaks such as NM-on-by-default, etc.

Is that really what that iso file gives me?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]