[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F9 Alpha spinning



On 01/30/2008 04:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 01/26/2008 05:05 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
Here are some stats of todays re-spin against the latest f9-alpha bits and
livecd configs.  It looks like our desktop spin lost 2mb overnight,
while everything else got bigger. In the diff below, I also include a list
of packages that have shrunk since F8.

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.6G 2008-01-26 02:28 F9-Alpha-Developer-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 767M 2008-01-26 02:42 F9-Alpha-FEL-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0G 2008-01-26 15:25 F9-Alpha-games-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 712M 2008-01-26 01:18 F9-Alpha-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 688M 2008-01-26 01:46 F9-Alpha-KDE-i686-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 801M 2008-01-26 02:02 F9-Alpha-KDE-x86_64-20080126.0.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 768M 2008-01-26 01:35 F9-Alpha-x86_64-20080126.0.iso

Whatever happened to the Desktop spin?

The desktop spin has never been called that in the filename. What you need is

F9-Alpha-i686-20080126.0.iso

I'm not talking about the default "Fedora" spin which provides a desktop (and which also lets you install server stuff). The "Desktop" spin was the targeted desktop spin of packages, and with tweaks such as NM-on-by-default, etc.

Is that really what that iso file gives me?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]