Request to re-add option to disable SELinux

[Andrew Farris]

Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 17:16 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>> SELinux should be disablable is the wrong discussion. The discussion you should
>> be having is "I've filed a few bugs where SELinux didn't magically do the right
>> thing, how do we fix them and can we make these less likely to occur in future"
> 
> I think the only way to "fix" it for the foreseeable future is to
> simplify policy, so that only a very limited set of services are
> confined. Then, when the graphical tools and user experience have
> eventually caught up, it'll be trivial to switch policy again.

selinux-policy-targeted is precisely that.

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul at gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net
  gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB  5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29