Proposed SIG: Windows MinGW cross-compiler SIG
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Jul 8 16:29:21 UTC 2008
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:17:47PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> writes:
>
> > [...] I said it's not a problem for the MinGW SIG (ie. Fedora), but
> > it is a problem for the libvirt project.
>
> So it is that important to you to permit someone to distribute
> proprietary libvirt-based applications that run *on windows*?
> Is providing this sort of enablement important to Fedora?
IMHO, yes. We've had alot of feedback that people really like the libraries
we provide for managing virtualized Fedora / Linux hosts, and they'd like
to make use of our libraries in their existing closed source management
tools. Not having Windows support for our management tools is a show-stopper
for many potential users though.
So by providing libvirt client bits on Windows we enable more people to
deploy & manage virtualized Fedora hosts. This will increase the number
of people using Fedora and virtualization which is a good thing for the
Fedora community. It also helps the libvirt community which becomes a
defacto standard open source managment API across platforms, at a time
when all other virt vendors would rather their users were locked into
proprietry custom APIs & tools.
If we only provided GPL'd libraries for libvirt on Windows they simply
won't use libvirt or Fedora virtualization, pushing more people towards
closed source virt solutuons like VMWare
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list